We have general education requirements here in Florida that call for, among other things, "historical understanding," but there are no state-mandated history courses at the college level. Our institution has a "bucket" of gen ed courses that the student must choose two from. Both U.S. surveys and both European surveys are included, with a preference for U.S. since 1877. Students can skip history entirely and choose sociology, psychology, political science, anthropology, or economics.
The history courses themselves all have Common Course Outcomes. The debate arises about the balance of "content" and skills. Some faculty seem to want "coverage" of the content, while others focus more on history as an intellectual discipline. It was a fairly contentious debate over this issue late last year.
We are also seeing increased pressure to cover, or even celebrate, U.S. history. There are calls for our history classes to spend more time on "ethical reasoning." Faculty have also been told that they should try to give our U.S. courses a more "global perspective."
I'd like to see a roundtable or panel at the 2015 AHA that addresses the course outcomes question. What state or institutional pressures are on history faculty to address certain issues or give courses more of a particular perspective?
Is anyone interested in developing such a roundtable?
--Mark
-------------------------------------------
Mark Smith
Valencia Coll.
Orlando FL
msmith01@mail.valenciacollege.edu -------------------------------------------